In 2009 I decided to try and do the thing I always wanted to do: become a writer. This blog tracks the journey. I'm now a Content Editor at Matter & Co, writing every day, mostly for Pioneers Post.
Saturday, 3 October 2009
Insurance - An idea that prays on insecurity
Before I got made unemployed in April I took out a loan to purchase the freehold on my property. At the time I thought it prudent to get insurance on the loan as recession and unemployment were forecast. Well, whaddya know? I got made unemployed and Lloyds refused to pay out, citing a clause that if I was 'notified of' unemployment within 30 days of taking out the policy all bets were off. I argued that I was notified of only a 'period of consultation'; notice of unemployment would only come at the end of that period. So far, so boring. We have been back and forth since May and in the end the mundanity of it wore me down. I hope the following amuses; its the letter that I wrote to Lloyds cancelling the insurance. Maybe its petty, but it made me feel good. The suit on the left is Lloyds Group Chief Exec Eric Daniels, who claimed this year that his million pound wage was 'a modest salary' to the Treasury Select Committee.
Dear Ms Horton
Thank you for your letter dated 15th September.
I took loan protection insurance out with you as it seemed the sensible option given that the media was full of stories of financial meltdown, mass redundancies and general impending doom. Frankly, we could argue all day long about what constitutes being ‘notified of employment’. I still hold the view that I was initially notified about a period of consultation, not unemployment, but I’m sure that Lloyds lawyers are very good, diligent and expensive. Frankly I can’t be bothered to enter into what would undoubtedly be a very prolonged and boring fight which the massive organisation you work for would inevitably win.
It seems far more sensible to just cancel my insurance with you, which I’m notifying you of forthwith. It is much more satisfying to think that I wont be paying you around £2000 for the pleasure of you finding a clause in the terms and conditions that stops me from enjoying the benefits of the insurance should anything else go wrong.
Yours disillusioned,
Lee Mannion
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bravo! What a bunch of rotten bananas.
ReplyDeleteHope your book is progressing better than mine...
Ellie
Oh but Lee, won't you think of the poor sharelholders? Some of them can barely afford their kids' public school fees or the fuel for their SUVs, the poor devils. Why should they suffer just because you were careless enough to lose your job? Eric Daniels has one of the best examples of a punch-me face I've seen in a long time. I guess he gets that smug smile on his greedy little mouth by alternating between sucking the lifeblood out of the country and Satan's cock.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds to me like you have a pretty good case for getting what you're owed, if you haven't done so already it's probably worth getting the opinion of the office of fair trading and trading standards before you give up.
Makes your blood boil doesn't it. And also makes you say fucking wankers. Well done for speaking out. I hate this kind of miserable customer service and when will the vertical instititions of this world wake up to the new world of the relationship revolution? (plug for a forthcoming book I know). Onwards and upwards comrade.
ReplyDelete